Subjective quality control in food processing, which relies on human judgment, is prone to errors, bias, and can cause over 45% quality deviation between shifts. To ensure the predictable, consistent product quality customers expect, food manufacturers must eliminate this risk by transitioning from manual checks to a data-driven, objective quality process. The ultimate solution is implementing 24/7 automated inline quality control vision systems. These AI-powered systems provide real-time data, reduce waste, stabilize yield, and ensure traceability, transforming quality control from a cost center into an engine for plant optimization.
Why subjective quality control is a major risk
Quality control is a non-negotiable part of modern food production, essential for consistency and meeting client expectations. Yet, many production lines still rely heavily on human judgment. This subjective approach is a major risk factor, especially in industrial settings, leading to:
- Variation, Bias, and Error.
- Increased Waste and Inefficiency.
- Customer Complaints.
Human judgment is easily influenced by factors that introduce subjective blind spots, such as:
- Fatigue and inconsistent training.
- Differences between day and night shifts.
- Personal bias (e.g., favoring one batch).
- Environmental factors like poor lighting.
Building an objective quality culture: the foundation
Eliminating subjectivity starts with foundational, objective processes. Before automation, implement these steps:
1. Define measurable standards
Quality must be defined by measurable specifications, not vague terms like 'looks good'.
- Examples of Specifications: Color, dimensions, or percentage of peel remains.
- Standardize Tools: Use measurable equipment like colorimeters, texture analyzers, or size cards for side-by-side comparison.
- Create a "Golden Standard": Recreate a physical sample of the perfect final product for accurate operator comparison during checks.
2. Implement a clear decision tree
Operators need a standardized, flowchart-based guide for every quality check. This system dictates a clear action for every outcome: "Is X present? Yes or no. If yes, follow this action. If no, proceed to the next step".
3. Establish a data-driven culture (The 4 Steps)
Adopt a process that stresses accountability, structure, and continuous improvement:
- Document Everything: Stress the importance of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for every check. If it’s not written down, it’s subjective.
- Separate Production from QC: The quality team must report independently from the production team to remove pressure and potential bias to pass products faster.
- Audit the Auditors: Implement internal audits where a second person or supervisor re-checks the quality technician’s work to ensure consistent output and application of objective standards.
- Root Cause Analysis: Analyze product failures using data to find and adjust the production cause, Don't just to blame the inspector.
The final step: automation and real-time quality control
Even with perfect manual processes, subjectivity is hard to eliminate entirely. Data shows that quality deviation can exceed 45% between shifts. Human limitations such as getting sick, being replaced by less experienced workers, or simply getting bored with mind-numbing work lead to unpredictable production output.
The shift to real-time, 24/7 automated inline quality control is now a requirement, not a luxury.
| Feature |
Manual Human QC |
Automated QC (e.g., Polysense Qualify) |
| Detection |
Relies on human senses |
Uses objective hardware/vision systems |
| Consistency |
Unstable product quality |
Repeatable and predictable results |
| Operating Time |
Time-consuming and periodic |
24/7 and Real-time control |
| Bias/Error |
Prone to human error, bias, and fatigue |
Not prone to human error |
| Traceability |
Limited traceability |
Predictable and trackable (records every data point) |
| Training |
Regularly train the QC team or operators |
One-time training algorithm |
| Cost |
Salary of multiple FTEs |
1 cheaper license |
| Waste/Yield |
Increased waste |
More Yield (reduces waste) |
How automated systems work
Automated vision systems are your "partner in crime". They are trained with objective data of the final end product to prevent subjectivity from entering the training process.
- They don't get tired or sick.
- They provide real-time monitoring, alerting the operator immediately when an error occurs so they can take action and avoid tons of food waste.
- Operators can then focus on higher-value tasks and monitor multiple lines at once.
Objective data analysis and future optimization
Integrating quality data into your SCADA or MES systems provides a complete overview of the production line. This data is the key to true future-proofing, allowing you to:
- Analyze efficiency and identify blind spots for optimization.
- Link quality data to process parameters and optimize them in real-time. For example, adjusting aggressive peelers that cause excessive yield loss.
By eliminating subjectivity and embracing this data-driven, automated approach, you move beyond just catching errors. You gain the ability to stabilize yield and gain predictable output, turning quality control into a powerful competitive advantage.
‍